You must be asking yourself what this fourteen year old ballerina has to do with martial arts, fighting, and history?
In fact, I suspect that almost everyone who swings a sword or reenacts can stop reading. I suspect that everyone trained in any sport or physical art can look at this young woman, and guess what today’s blog is about, and what I’m going to say.
By the way, this is Miss Hannah Lowe of Toronto. She is a passable Italian longswordswoman, and an effective arming sword fighter as well. And from her and some other young people I have the honour to train I have learned some dramatic and important–in in some cases, disheartening–lessons about history, and about fighting.
Hannah has been dancing since she was three years old. By fourteen, she has reached a stunning level of proficiency; if you saw her dance the role of the Sugar Plum Fairy in the Nutcracker, you’d know that she’s nearly at the level of a professional.
Vittorino Da Feltre, the father of Italian humanism (one of them) and the architect of Humanist education, as well as Vergerius and others recommended that young men learn to swim and to dance (some of the humanists were dead set against dancing, but let’s leave them to their stodgy lives) and the Ancient Greeks were devoted to dance. Both cultures–Medieval/Renaissance and Archaic Greek–were devoted to gymnastics. Several educators suggest that children swim, dance, and do gymnastics until they are twelve, and at that age, start the art of arms. As a sword teacher, I was lucky to find Hannah and my daughter Bea at about this age. Think of them as my experiments in teaching the children of the past (aristocratic children, anyway… see below.)
The results were disquieting, and changed the way I see the martial arts of the past and the qualities and training of pre-modern warriors. Hannah went through the entire 12 week basic children’s fencing corpus in an hour and a half. Some of you are nodding–others, perhaps, fencing teachers, assume I’m a dreadful instructor. But both Hannah and my own daughter,(an eleven-year old fencer who has been dancing since age three) do not need to repeat body postures more than twice. If they are shown a drill, they learn it. They don’t discuss, they do not posture about their own knowledge (displaying a lack thereof). They do not complain. Most of all, however, they exactly mirror what they see. So, for example, Hannah mastered the long lunge the first time she did it. There was no casting about for balance at the end of her reach, and no fumbling recovery. The amusing corollary to this is that if you, the teacher, have a bad habit, you can assure yourself that it will be instantly transmitted.
This is stunning. The speed with which children take to the art of arms suggests to me that no modern adult athlete taking up Armizare–or Pankration or Bolognese or Kenjutusu–can possibly match the art of learning, the bodily discipline, or the enthusiasm for practice of a twelve-year-old. It explains a number of things that had made me wonder in the Medieval manuals… in Fiore, I often look at the complexity of the plays and wonder how often a swordsman encountered an opponent as well trained–and how often, for example, he even remembered under pressure how to counter a punta falsa. But Hannah and my other dance children suggest to me that they would, in fact, remember their sword lessons, for ever. I recently had an opportunity to train one child four days in a row. I structured our first lesson so that he would get a review of things he’d seen with my friend Greg Mele in February. Apparently I was the one who needed review– he remembered everything, down to foot placement and even what errors he’d made in class.
Ah… but if they all began training at age eleven of twelve, I think I can see it differently. And the other thing that emerges is how very much better the children of aristocrats must have been at war then the children of peasants–because training matters. Training is not just good for itself, but for self-discipline and confidence. Both excellent virtues, in battle.
And this leads me to the part that writers about these people probably need to grapple with. Because ultimately, it is about character. And youth and training form character. Young people who practice their arts for fifteen hours a week are going to have different motivations and different ideas about pain, endurance, pleasure, fitness, and even morality. They will make decisions that would be very different from the decisions of untrained people.
Antonio Cornazzano, a sometime mercenary man-at-arms and the author of one of the earliest books on dancing, suggests that a his well-trained princess should be able to read Latin, to deliver oratory extempore in that language, and to dance a long dance of her own composing to music of her own composing and accompanied by her own singing. That would be your thirteen year old princess, and it suggests that being a princess could be pretty hard work. Or… just… practice.
And really, for all you aspiring knights, swordspeople, and martial artists… and baseball players and dancers… it is really all about practice. Practice at home. Practice while you walk. Make practice an essential part of your life, and you will be a vastly better practitioner than if you merely go to class once or twice a week. Class isn’t where you learn. Class is where you learn what to practice the rest of the time. You think practice is boring?
Here’s Hannah:
I practice 10 3/4 hours a week. I’m going to estimate I spend 7 hours a week thinking about dance. (That sounds crazy!) Occasionally I find practice boring, but there are always an infinity of things that can be improved and tweaked, and perfected, so it takes a lot to make something actually boring.
My favourite form of practice is probably how I do it with my private coach. We’ll take a variation that I’m learning and just work on every little detail for an hour straight, or we’ll start with a small exercise and build it up and keep working on it until it’s practically an entire piece. This way of learning is great for everything, technique, presentation, stamina, conditioning….
I’m going to guess that the knights of the fourteenth century and the hoplite class Greeks of the 5th c. BCE felt about the same about their arts…
If you note, my characters all train. Tom Swan visits swordsmen in every town he travels to…sometimes so I can name drop, but also because I want the reader to see that good swordsmanship, jousting skills, horsemanship–people in the past worked on these every day.
And it is what I do myself, of course. But then, I started fencing when I was eleven. 🙂
Next Up– The Pen and Sword Tour 2015! Want to come to Greece, see a lot of sites and battlefields, play with some period weapons,and eat some great food? Oh, and I teach a sword class… That’s come out here on Saturday, I think. If I pressed the correct buttons…
Oh, and a small note: I own a copy of Antonio Cornazzano’s book on war, and my historical reenactment ‘Not-For-Profit’ (called Hoplologia) intends to pay to have it professionally translated and then we’ll make it available as a PDF free on the internet. We’ll be cloud funding and looking for donations in a few weeks. Hope you are interested. There’s good stuff in Cornazzano. And we want to make history live, don’t we?
parmenionbooks says
Reblogged this on parmenionbooks and commented:
Every day is a school day…
ehcgsecretary says
It rather highlights, again, that how much of what we consider to be the “way” that things should be done now are flawed and that the practical and necessary ways of the past had discovered what worked.
I have also noted as a teacher/practitioner, I started the use of weapons properly around 9, though dad had made weapons from as soon as I could walk, archery from age two, that how many of the methods of teaching we have now, are far more about how people/adults think on what is important to teach, rather than what is important for the child/beginner to actually learn. Also that learn is about self discovery so that one is not a teacher, but a guide.
Phokion says
Nicely said.
Dill Childs says
I read this with interest, but also some sadness. I am a dyspraxic. All the hours of training in the world won’t stop me falling over my own two feet. I can only watch in awe and wonder those who are lucky enough to be born with excellent muscle memory. I
Phokion says
Dill, I’m a very slow physical learner…I need to repeat things over and over. Oddly, this gave me my excellent practice habits… I too envy the athletically gifted.
ehcgsecretary says
ll and someone whose day job is teaching people to move themselves and weapons, we have had a number of students with dyspraxic, a number of thee have been some fo the best movers we have taught. As to falling over ones feet, we all do that, the question is what one does once it happens and how ones views yourself because of it, no one is born with good muscle memory, but we can affect how our nervous system develops movements by how we think or rather how we have been taught to think, by ourselves and others, about our ability and potential.
Most people who find it hard to develop new movement skills have been told in their past they were not physical. Heck, my school reports said I was uncoordinated, yet at home I ran tghe woods, shooting bows and using the weapons my father taught me, I was far from un-cordinated. The system viewed me as uncoordinated because it didn’t like or engage in the organised sports that they had on offer. If I hadn’t had that to go home to, I may have listened to what the system said and become what they defined me as. We are what we define ourselves to be, let the definition be truthful but your own, not someone elses
Don Benson says
in the middle ages aristocratic boys became pages at age 7, and i bet their parents tried to place them with a lord that had a good master of arms to train them.
Phokion says
Don, I agree, although there were, I suspect, as many factors to being sent as a page as there were to marrying off your daughters… family influence, money, distance, alliances… As a martial artist, I confess I’m very eager to see any evidence about the men who taught in the castles. SO far, there is very little. The kind of training that became available in the late 14th c. may just not have existed before that–it may be of a piece with the rest of renaissance education. SO much to learn.
ehcgsecretary says
I think the training was there. The rise of our knowledge is based upon the “written” works about it. The rise of these works come from various aspects. The notion of written work as an end of itself and the idea that the written work can be used to preserve knowledge and the allow those that don’t have direct access to the skill.
So in much the way that the crafts and skills were passed on directly, master to apprentice, the similar pattern was there in the arts martial.
Though I also think that the martial skills can be over emphasised to the so called “fighting classes”, other aspect become more important in the life of those that fall in that class, unless they make arms their full time profession.
Phokion says
I think it was there too, but as a research oriented person, I’d love to see — well, anything from the 11th or 12th centuries suggesting practice of what we’d call training… however, I suspect it was all ‘lifestyle’ training, really. The quintain and the pell.
prue batten says
This was such a fascinating article, not least because I remember at some point one of the top professional football teams here in Australia, sent their players to ballet school for lessons in fine muscle tuning, balance, timing and strength. I learned Taichi 30 years ago and it is a daily discipline (with emphasis on the discipline) and perhaps helps me maintain balance and flexibility as I age. The only thing that worries me about your emphasis on age is that I want to learn archery and a dozen other active sports and I may be too old…
But this paragraph of yours is the one that intrigues me the most:
‘And this leads me to the part that writers about these people probably need to grapple with. Because ultimately, it is about character. And youth and training form character. Young people who practice their arts for fifteen hours a week are going to have different motivations and different ideas about pain, endurance, pleasure, fitness, and even morality. They will make decisions that would be very different from the decisions of untrained people.’
I had never really given any thought to the fact that ‘character’ could come down to the someone practicing an art form up to 15 hours a day and having the gifted life that allowed that. It makes sense, and yet as both a reader and a writer, I want characters to possess attitude, fitness and morality (or lack thereof) because of other things as well – family guidance, the Church (I read and write medieval fiction), pressure of daily work and survival against the odds.
I do love your posts, Christian. You always make my grey matter work that much harder.
Phokion says
I agree Prue…it is merely one aspect of the craft and of the creation of character… but I dislike falsity in character building, and I’d suggest that any child of this ‘system’ may be venal, crass, violent, or ignorant, but would seldom be cowardly, shy, fear pain, or lack focus… 🙂
ehcgsecretary says
Prue, you are “never” too old, I have taught people of all ags to shoot and use weapons. However as Christian points out, the younger you catch someone it normally makes it easier, Mainly in my experience because they have had less time to acquire and listen to the doubting voices that complicate and tell us that we can’t do something, those being the things that are the biggest inhibitors to acquiring new skills.
bobthewarbow says
Truly a wonderful post. Especially the tale of the ballerina herself.That warms the heart. Truly, the young can be so delightfully driven. I recall myself at that age as an aspiring guitarslinger. I must have spent some 30 hours a week with that instrument in my bedroom.. and yes.. so familiar in the ballerina tale.. spending 10 hours a week THINKING about dancing… Yep an additional 10 hours thinking and listening about what i would play and how I would play it.. Bottom line…I was ridiculously good, locally speaking, for the guitaristic level of the late ´70´s early ´80´s when i came out of that bedroom. That worked. Got me the girls… but girls and guitars don´t get along well together in the competition for passion and attention. Bottom line… afer quite a few years of continuous girls-guitar disasters I met that special girl and threw the guitar out of the window.. 28 years later she´s still my love…
I admit… Not completely about “WRITING ABOUT FIGHTING: PRACTICE AND EXERCISE”
but drive is a very important factor to strive for excellence.
As an archer.I will readily concede to the importance of dancing to swordsplay. However.. archers don´t dance. But the driven amongst us also THINK about how they´re going to hit their targets. And the more we think, the more we hit. We see those arrows flying in our minds everywhere.
ehcgsecretary says
It has only been in recent years that our culture has stopped being one that danced. Historically speaking cultures danced.
So while dancing may not seem to have a direct relevance to an archer, it was certainly a physical factor in the culture that produced, for example, the medieval English archer.
Increasing body awareness and and control, can’t be a bad thing for any physical skill.
Phokion says
Well said, again. 🙂
ehcgsecretary says
we seem to be agreeing quite well here and on FB!
🙂
Basia says
You’re talking about 12 year olds learning quickly – but if they started learning kinesthetic skills at three then it took them nine years to get skilled enough to get to the point of picking things up quickly. What I saw reading this wasn’t so much a lesson about age specifically so much as about it taking a decade of diligent training to get to that point.